|
Our culture is saturated with the advocacy model. In our court system, lawyers from opposing sides advocate for their clients. They cast the evidence, the relevant law and their client in the best possible light. Politicians also frame their arguments as US against THEM. In an attempt to provide balance (or hype controversy), journalists cover scientific issues by interviewing scientific experts with opposing opinions, no matter how extremist their views. These dueling scientists cherry-pick the data to advocate for their favorite interpretations of reality. Within companies, rival research teams or business divisions vie for funding and management approval.
Garvin and Roberto find that better decisions arise from inquiry. Inquiry is a process for really deciding: generating options, analyzing outcomes and testing them against agreed-upon objectives. Of course, taken to an extreme, inquiry can degenerate into paralysis by analysis.
Turn off the projector and think
As it is typically used, PowerPoint is a tool for advocacy. I believe that PowerPoint can be used well in an inquiry process. It is an effective means of introducing and sharing ideas. Once the ideas are on the table, good decision making requires that you identify and consider feasible alternatives, then weigh them against the goals of the organization. In short, good decision making requires that you turn off the projector and think.
|